DCF Sickos: Dad keeping promise to give daughter a puppy is sex abuse.

It is my theory that most DCF social workers are working out their own tortured past, and projecting it on the parents of their poor child "clients", against whom they seek revenge for their inner pain. Surely, the story below confirms such an interpretation.

Mr. Paterson (a pseudonym), a kind and good father to his two little girls, promised "Vicky", the younger one, a puppy for her birthday. Meanwhile, the children's mother, with whom he had split years before, had began to make many false allegations about Mr. Paterson, and obtained custody of the children by a family court order. The allegations have now all been soundly disproved by a legion of originally suspicious investigators, GALs, therapists, and assorted courtiers, but the mother would not relent.

Months went by, and the father could not get the puppy, as Vicky wanted to help pick it out, and she was kept from seeing her father. Vicky still wanted her puppy, so she wrote a note to her daddy. In it, she reminded him that he had made a promise to get her the pet, and asking if they could find one.

Dad wrote a letter back, telling Vicky that he had not forgotten his promise, and would get her one somehow. He brought his reply to the child's school before school hours, and asked them to deliver it to the mother, an action allowed under the existing court order.

The mother became enraged, and made a report to DCF about the father's dastardly offense of promising his daughter a puppy. A posse was then convened to condemn the hapless father for, of all things, grooming his child for sex with him. You DO see the connection, don't you?

Later, when the father appealed the absurd finding of "abuse" to a DCF administrative tribunal, the hearing officer agreed that there was no intent to "groom" the child for a sexual relationship. However, the DCF still found that Mr. Paterson committed an act of legal "neglect" of Vicky by promising her a puppy, when he didn't have custody of her.

At that hearing, the social worker nattered on about what a dangerous predator Mr. Paterson was, due to his puppy promise. "It's not up to him to give her a puppy", he opined. "She lives with her mother." Well, well, now doesn't that prove what a horribly neglectful father he was! The nerve of that man to want to keep a promise to his little daughter!

Such stories reinforce certainty about the complete human and emotional bankruptcy that many DCF agents show. It adds to the already large reservoir of outrage about DCF's relentless drive to destroy as many families as possible.

It is clear that its agents are "sick twisted freaks", to borrow Glenn Beck's phrase. Parents should beware.